Alan Abramowitz, Emory · Three-model toggle
Time for Change gives Republicans 50.8% of the 2028 popular vote
That is a 57% chance of winning it. In the backtest, this model’s typical miss was ±4.6 points, so 80% of outcomes would land between 44.7% and 56.9%.
Two-party popular vote, not the Electoral College. If the election were today: the latest published quarters and today’s approval stand in for 2028. Source: FRED/ALFRED (BEA, BLS, Census), FOMC projections; model fits by this site; approval averages compiled by Wikipedia contributors (CC BY-SA 4.0); Gallup (1948–2024). As of October 16, 2026.
Show the numbers
| Date | Share | 80% range | Chance |
|---|---|---|---|
| October 14, 2026 | 50.8% | 44.7%–56.9% | 56.9% |
| October 15, 2026 | 50.8% | 44.7%–56.9% | 56.9% |
| October 16, 2026 | 50.8% | 44.7%–56.9% | 56.9% |
What pushes it up or down
Two-party popular vote, not the Electoral College. Source: FRED/ALFRED (BEA, BLS, Census), FOMC projections; model fits by this site. As of October 16, 2026.
Show the numbers
| Input | Points |
|---|---|
| Typical party-in-power edge | +1.6 |
| Presidential approval | −3.0 |
| Party in its first term | +2.0 |
| Latest quarter of GDP growth | +0.2 |
Today’s inputs against 1948–2024
If the election were today: the latest published quarters and today’s approval stand in for 2028. Source: FRED/ALFRED (BEA, BLS, Census), FOMC projections; model fits by this site; approval averages compiled by Wikipedia contributors (CC BY-SA 4.0); Gallup (1948–2024). As of October 16, 2026.
Show the numbers
| Year | Q2 GDP growth (first estimate) | Net approval |
|---|---|---|
| Today | 2.2 | −22.4 |
| 1948 | 10.0 | −4.0 |
| 1952 | −0.3 | −26.0 |
| 1956 | 0.8 | 55.0 |
| 1960 | 1.6 | 37.0 |
| 1964 | 4.6 | 59.0 |
| 1968 | 5.3 | −3.0 |
| 1972 | 8.9 | 23.0 |
| 1976 | 4.4 | 5.0 |
| 1980 | −9.1 | −27.0 |
| 1984 | 7.5 | 18.0 |
| 1988 | 3.1 | 8.0 |
| 1992 | 1.4 | −17.0 |
| 1996 | 4.2 | 10.0 |
| 2000 | 5.2 | 15.0 |
| 2004 | 3.0 | −1.0 |
| 2008 | 1.9 | −40.0 |
| 2012 | 1.5 | −2.0 |
| 2016 | 1.2 | 4.0 |
| 2020 | −32.9 | −19.0 |
| 2024 | 2.8 | −20.0 |
How it works
Alan Abramowitz’s model combines one economic number (annualized GDP growth in the second quarter of the election year, as first published) with June presidential approval and a first-term bonus.
Because it mixes the economy with approval, it belongs to neither line. It appears on its own and in the three-model version of the economy line.
Abramowitz left 2020 out of his latest fit; here it stays in, so every model is judged on the same 20 elections.
Time for Change uses the latest quarter's growth (2026 Q2) in place of Q2 2028.
Approval: the current approval consensus stands in for June 2028.
The fitted equation
| Term | Coefficient |
|---|---|
| Constant | 48.959 |
| Q2 GDP growth | 0.180 |
| June net approval | 0.114 |
| First-term party | 4.002 |
Its record
Predicting each election with a version fitted without it, the model’s typical error is ±4.6 points and it called the popular-vote winner in 15 of 20 elections. It missed 1948, 1960, 1976, 2016, 2024. See every election.