Economy vs. Mood

1952 presidential election · popular vote · forecasts fitted without 1952

1952: the economy and the mood both pointed to a loss for the Democrats, and they lost

The Democrats held the White House, with no sitting president on the ballot. They lost the two-party popular vote with 44.7%.

Economy said
49.3%
off by 4.6 pts · right winner
Mood said
46.2%
off by 1.5 pts · right winner
Forecasts against the result
Black line: what happened. Circle: economy line. Square: mood line. Shaded half: the party in power won.

Two-party popular vote, not the Electoral College. Out-of-sample: each model fitted on the other 19 elections. Sources: Ray Fair (vote shares 1948–2020), FEC (2024), FRED/ALFRED (BEA, BLS, Census), FOMC projections; model fits by this site; Gallup June approval.

Each model’s forecast for the Democrats
ModelForecastErrorWinner
Economy line49.3%+4.6✓ right
Fair46.7%+2.0✓ right
Bread and Peace53.9%+9.2✗ wrong
Mood line46.2%+1.5✓ right
Time for Change46.1%+1.4✓ right

What went into the forecasts

1952 inputs against the 1948–2024 average
Input1952AverageUsed by
Growth per person, election year (% a year)0.51.8Fair
Inflation over the term (% a year)2.43.1Fair
Quarters of strong growth (of 15)74Fair
Real income growth per person (weighted) (% a year)3.01.5Bread and Peace
US war deaths in the term (thousand)29.32.9Bread and Peace
GDP growth, April–June (% a year)−0.31.3Time for Change
June net approval (Gallup) (points)−264Mood, Time for Change
Unemployment, September (%)3.15.5Context only

Economic inputs are revised figures (no pre-election vintage is archived this far back). The Democrats had held the White House for 5 terms.

Economies most like 1952’s

  • 1956: the Republicans held the White House and won with 57.1%.
  • 2024: the Democrats held the White House and lost with 49.2%.
  • 2000: the Democrats held the White House and won with 50.3%.

Closest by growth, inflation, unemployment and real income growth, measured in standard deviations (growth per person, inflation over the term, unemployment, real income growth per person).

Where each number comes from
  • result: Fair atbl1.txt VP (Democratic two-party share)
  • party running duration: Fair atbl1.txt I, DPER, DUR
  • fair inputs: computed from GNPC96@1959-02-19 and GNPDEF@1965-08-19, through term quarter 15
  • q2 growth: advance estimate: GNPC96@1958-12-21 (earliest-available)
  • income: A229RC0Q052SBEA@today (revised), deflated by CPIAUCSL (earliest-available; vintages 1994-02-17)
  • approval: Harry S. Truman, Gallup 1952-06-15-1952-06-20: 32/58. https://news.gallup.com/wwwv7interactives/json/ALLPRESIDENTS/codename.aspx ; https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1iEl565M1mICTubTtoxXMdxzaHzAcPTnb3kpRndsrfyY/export?format=csv&gid=452265038
  • fatalities: Hibbs (2007), Table A1 p.13 (Korea) https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/15910/1/MPRA_paper_15910.pdf