Economy vs. Mood

1996 presidential election · popular vote · forecasts fitted without 1996

1996: the economy and the mood both pointed to a win for the Democrats, and they won

The Democrats held the White House and the sitting president was on the ballot. They won the two-party popular vote with 54.7%.

Economy said
53.4%
off by 1.3 pts · right winner
Mood said
53.9%
off by 0.9 pts · right winner
Forecasts against the result
Black line: what happened. Circle: economy line. Square: mood line. Shaded half: the party in power won.

Two-party popular vote, not the Electoral College. Out-of-sample: each model fitted on the other 19 elections. Sources: Ray Fair (vote shares 1948–2020), FEC (2024), FRED/ALFRED (BEA, BLS, Census), FOMC projections; model fits by this site; Gallup June approval.

Each model’s forecast for the Democrats
ModelForecastErrorWinner
Economy line53.4%−1.3✓ right
Fair54.4%−0.4✓ right
Bread and Peace51.6%−3.1✓ right
Mood line53.9%−0.9✓ right
Time for Change54.9%+0.1✓ right

What went into the forecasts

1996 inputs against the 1948–2024 average
Input1996AverageUsed by
Growth per person, election year (% a year)1.81.8Fair
Inflation over the term (% a year)2.33.1Fair
Quarters of strong growth (of 15)34Fair
Real income growth per person (weighted) (% a year)1.31.5Bread and Peace
US war deaths in the term (thousand)0.02.9Bread and Peace
GDP growth, April–June (% a year)4.21.3Time for Change
June net approval (Gallup) (points)104Mood, Time for Change
Unemployment, September (%)5.25.5Context only

Economic inputs are the figures as first published before election day. The Democrats had held the White House for 1 term.

Economies most like 1996’s

  • 2016: the Democrats held the White House and won with 51.2%.
  • 2004: the Republicans held the White House and won with 51.2%.
  • 1988: the Republicans held the White House and won with 53.8%.

Closest by growth, inflation, unemployment and real income growth, measured in standard deviations (growth per person, inflation over the term, unemployment, real income growth per person).

Where each number comes from
  • result: Fair atbl1.txt VP (Democratic two-party share)
  • party running duration: Fair atbl1.txt I, DPER, DUR
  • fair inputs: computed from GDPC1@1996-10-30 and GDPDEF@1996-10-30, through term quarter 15
  • q2 growth: advance estimate: GDPC1@1996-08-01 (first-release)
  • income: DSPI@1996-10-31 (first-release) / population B230RC0Q173SBEA, deflated by CPIAUCSL (first-release; vintages 1996-10-16)
  • approval: Bill Clinton, Gallup 1996-06-27-1996-06-30: 52/42. https://news.gallup.com/wwwv7interactives/json/ALLPRESIDENTS/codename.aspx ; https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1iEl565M1mICTubTtoxXMdxzaHzAcPTnb3kpRndsrfyY/export?format=csv&gid=148211037
  • fatalities: zero per Hibbs (2007) Table A1